1
0
mirror of https://github.com/sstephenson/bats.git synced 2024-11-17 11:42:33 +01:00
Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mike Bland
f5acd28612
bats-exec-suite: Count tests w/ BATS_TEST_PATTERN
Under Bash 3.2.57(1)-release and 4.4.12(1)-release on a MacBook Pro with
a 2.9GHz Intel Core i5 CPU and 8GB 1867MHz DDR3 RAM, this shaves off
O(0.16s) from the current test suite.

Before this change:

  46 tests, 0 failures

  real    0m3.541s
  user    0m2.125s
  sys     0m0.937s

After this change:

  real    0m3.372s
  user    0m2.031s
  sys     0m0.894s
2017-09-30 15:12:38 -04:00
Sam Stephenson
bfa4ebcd0f Prefer let x+=1 for incrementing counters
The `((x++))` syntax is shorthand for `let x++`. According to `help let`:

    If the last ARG evaluates to 0, let returns 1; 0 is returned
    otherwise.

Thus the exit status of the expression `x=0; let x++` is 1, since the post-increment `++` operator evaluates to the value of the variable before incrementing.

In Bash 4, this non-zero exit status properly triggers `set -e`'s error trap, but in Bash 3 it does not. That's why the tests were passing on OS X (Bash 3) but not Linux (Bash 4).

We can work around the problem by choosing an incrementation expression that never evaluates to 0, such as `+=` or the pre-increment `++` operator. For consistency and clarity, I've changed to `x+=1` everywhere.

Ref. #25, #27
2013-10-28 21:01:51 -05:00
Sam Stephenson
8873aab79f Extended syntax: "begin" line before each test is run 2013-10-21 11:32:09 -05:00
Sam Stephenson
19a05cc77d Suite support for aggregating multiple tests under a single run 2012-11-16 14:25:45 -06:00